๐ฒ
/
๐๐ ยท
Fully commited to rebooting early and often, this blog is in continuous do-over mode.
โ
๐๐กยท
A city in Columbia makes life better the natural way. For inspiration on how to improve America's public health, RFK should look here.
โฐ
๐๐ยท
The attack on firefighters in Idaho is a horror. How do we stop these acts?
โญ
๐๐ยท
Trump supporters have made this unnecessary tragedy likely. Compassion has been rejected while greed and arrogance are coveted as if they were precious golden rings.
โ
โ
๐๐ยท
I find the denial of free-will deeply nihilistic. Of three common denials, two posit determinism making the totality of space and time a fixed object. The last is
โ
from a psychological perspective - that our original nature and past nurture dictate our actions. All condemn our experience of choice to be a delusional aspect of
โ
our self-awareness - we lack genuine agency. Faith that the laws of nature that physicists hope to understand are determinstic, results in a single fixed path for all
โ
existence. Like a movie, the frames are do not change, whether the reels are played forward, backward or somehow viewed all at once, as an all-knowing God would. A
โ
film fixed by God's design rather than some deterministic laws of nature still leaves no room for choice. Many hold the view that omniscience doesn't preclude
โ
free-will, but the arguments would confer free-will to the characters on celluloid as the movie plays, despite the fact that every frame is a fixed object. Nihilism
โ
voids meaning, turning action into decay. Pascal should place his wager on free-will, even if it seems an impossibility.
โ
โ
๐๐ยท
I first saw the idea of an all-knowing God being incompatible with human free-will as an argument against a God that is both all-knowing and all-powerful. An
โ
all-powerful God can create a being with free-will, which means the future cannot be fixed and no being, including God, can know the entirety of actual space and
โ
time. Alternatively, an all-powerful God could create an all-powerful being, who's powers necessarily include the ability to change space and time in ways
โ
intentionally contrary to God's knowledge. Applying reason to concerns about the creator of all just don't go anywhere - after all, reason itself is a part of
๐
โ
creation.
๐ฆ
โ
๐
โ
๐๐ยท
I am an agnostic. Organized religion is based on historical documents and traditions handed from one generation to another - or the word of modern prophets. While not
๐ช
โ
necessarily so, both sources are easily inventions. I am not a solopsist and we all share the experience of awareness which, even if understood by science as a
โ
physical phenomenon, is well described as miraculous. It convinces me of our fundamental equality and that drives my notions of right and wrong, of human dignity and
โ
valid governance. I am politically progressive - supporting and caring for one another as we become able. Economically, I view capitalism as a transitional stage
โ
where we have rapidly advanced science and technology. Artificial Intelligence, which will eventually eliminate the economic value of all human labor, is forcing us
โ
to confront the end of the captialist era. We should bring it to a close with compassion and dignity.
โ
โ
๐๐ยท
In simple terms, conservative philosophy values achievement in absolute terms while progressive philosophy values the development of each individual's abilities.
โ
๐๐ยท
Appreciating Dead Posey today.
โ
โ
๐๐ยท
The 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution enshrines birthright citizenship for all who are โsubject to the jurisdiction thereof.โ Exclusion applies only to those
โ
who are not subject to our laws and cannot, by definition, apply to those who are in the US illegally. The alternative is to offer the immunity enjoyed by visiting
โ
diplomats to everyone who enters the US without a valid visa. An amendment is the only way to change this.
โ
โ
๐๐ยท
When we consider possible constitutional amendments, we have to also consider what the President's role can be in the process; does the oath of office apply to the
โ
Constitution as it stands, or the Constitution the President wishes for? It is clear that proposing or expressing support for an amendment is a violation of the
โฐ
Presidential oath and should result in a brief impeachment trial and a guilty verdict.